Skip to content
Knowledge / Regulation & Market Access

Critical Raw Materials Act: Permanent-Magnet Data Carriers and Passport Reuse

Article 28 CRMA creates permanent-magnet label and data-carrier duties. See the corrected implementing deadline, required data and DPP reuse rule.

Last verified
Share
LinkedIn X Email
Navigate this page

The Critical Raw Materials Act already creates a future product label and data-carrier architecture for permanent magnets, but the implementation clock cannot safely be converted into a calendar date yet. Article 28 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1252 says the label and carrier duties start two years after the relevant implementing act enters into force. A 3 June 2024 corrigendum changed the Article 28(2) deadline for that implementing act from 24 November 2026 to 24 November 2025. That corrected deadline has therefore passed. No adopted Article 28(2) implementing act was identified in the primary-source search used for this page as at 3 September 2026, so the two-year trigger cannot yet be calculated. What is settled is the product scope, core magnet information and a rule that reuses another EU product passport where one is required.

The date correction is not cosmetic

The original Official Journal rendering of Article 28(2) says the Commission shall adopt the implementing act by 24 November 2026. The official corrigendum published on 3 June 2024 changes that date to 24 November 2025.

That means a current article cannot repeat the 2026 date simply because it appears in the uncorrected base text. The consolidated EUR-Lex text carries the correction.

It also changes the current status. The corrected statutory deadline has passed. Until the implementing act is identified and its entry-into-force date is known, the “two years after” trigger for the main Article 28 label and carrier duties is not established as a calendar date.

That is exactly the kind of situation the EU Product Regulation Action Radar is designed to make visible.

Which products are named?

Article 28(1) names a defined set of products, including:

  • magnetic resonance imaging devices;
  • wind energy generators;
  • industrial robots;
  • motor vehicles;
  • light means of transport;
  • cooling generators;
  • heat pumps;
  • electric motors, including when integrated into other products;
  • automatic washing machines;
  • tumble dryers;
  • microwaves;
  • vacuum cleaners;
  • dishwashers.

The label indicates whether the product incorporates permanent magnets and, where it does, whether they are neodymium-iron-boron, samarium-cobalt, aluminium-nickel-cobalt or ferrite.

Products primarily designed for defence or space applications are exempt, and Article 28 also contains specific vehicle exceptions and a mechanism for sector-specific Union harmonisation legislation to displace the Article 28 requirements for the products concerned.

What the data carrier must reach

For products within Article 28(3), the carrier is linked to a unique product identifier and gives access to information including:

  • identity and contact information for the responsible person;
  • weight, location and chemical composition of each permanent magnet;
  • presence and type of coatings, glues and additives;
  • information needed for access and safe removal, including removal sequence and required tools or technologies.

Where the permanent magnets are exclusively contained in one or more electric motors, Article 28 allows defined substitutions using motor location and motor-removal information.

The information must be complete, up to date and accurate and remain available for at least the product's typical lifetime plus ten years. It can be model-level or, where the information differs, batch- or unit-level. Repairers, recyclers, market-surveillance authorities and customs authorities are expressly named as users.

This is not a marketing microsite. It is regulated lifecycle information.

The passport-reuse rule is the important architecture point

Article 28(6) says that where a product covered by the magnet data-carrier rule is also required to have a product passport under another Union legal act, the Article 28(4) magnet information is to be included in that product passport.

That is different from creating a second “magnet passport”.

For a product already inside a DPP regime, the design principle is:

one legal product record can carry an additional regulated information domain when the law explicitly requires reuse.

That makes Barcodes and Product Identifiers: What You Need and Which System Should Own Each Product Fact? directly relevant. The physical carrier, unique identifier and source system should not be designed independently.

What businesses should do

ActionWhat it means in practice
DO NOWIdentify whether any product family is one of the Article 28(1) product types and whether it contains one of the named permanent-magnet types.
DO NOWStart sourcing magnet weight, location, composition, coatings/glues/additives and safe-removal information from engineering and suppliers.
PREPAREKeep the data at model, batch or unit level according to where it actually varies.
PREPAREDesign the product identifier/carrier architecture so Article 28 data can be reused inside another Union product passport where required.
WATCHAdoption and entry into force of the Article 28(2) implementing act and any sector-specific legislation that displaces the rule.
DO NOT HARD-CODEA compliance date calculated from the corrected 24 November 2025 deadline. The trigger is the implementing act's entry into force, not its statutory due date.
DO NOT HARD-CODEA final label format before the implementing act is identified and reviewed.

What this does not mean

It does not mean Article 28 is itself a universal Digital Product Passport regime. It creates a label/data-carrier obligation for defined permanent-magnet products.

It does not mean the missed implementing-act deadline starts the two-year clock. The regulation ties the clock to entry into force of the implementing act.

It does not mean the same information can be duplicated indefinitely. If another Union act requires a product passport for the product, Article 28 specifically tells businesses where the magnet information belongs.

It does not mean every motor or appliance is automatically in the same application position. Product type, magnet type, exemptions, sector-specific law and the special 24 May 2029 timing for certain products all matter.

What would change this page

Recheck immediately when:

  • the Article 28(2) implementing act is adopted or published;
  • its entry-into-force date becomes known;
  • Article 28 product/CN scope is supplemented;
  • sector-specific Union legislation displaces Article 28 for a product class;
  • a product-specific DPP act changes how the magnet information is carried.

Does this reach your products?

Give ActivateDigital one product and it works out which obligations apply from the product's own character, and says which it cannot decide.

Worth sharing?

Help someone else make sense of product passports.

LinkedInXEmail

Primary sources