Skip to content
Knowledge / Digital Product Passports

Tyre Digital Product Passport Requirements

What is currently known about EU tyre Digital Product Passport requirements, how tyre-label and EPREL data differ from future DPP rules and what to prepare now.

Last verified
1 September 2026
Share
LinkedIn X Email
Navigate this page

Direct answer

Tyres do not currently have an adopted product-specific Digital Product Passport requirement under the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR).

Tyres are an ESPR priority product group and the European Commission is developing product-specific rules. The Commission's current DPP roadmap places the tyre delegated act in Q3-Q4 2027.1 That is an indicative planned adoption window, not a compliance deadline.

Tyres already have a substantial structured EU product-information regime under Regulation (EU) 2020/740 on tyre labelling. Suppliers must register covered tyre types in the product database before placing them on the Union market, and the regime includes a tyre type identifier, the tyre label, a product information sheet and performance data.23

That existing architecture matters for readiness. It does not mean the current tyre label or EPREL record is already the future tyre DPP.

The safe position today is:

QuestionCurrent position
Do tyres currently require an ESPR DPP?Not established; category is in official development
Is a tyre delegated act planned?In official development
Current Commission timingQ3-Q4 2027, indicative
Is that the compliance date?No
Is tyre-label information already regulated?Required under other law
Is EPREL/product-database information automatically future DPP content?No; not established
Are final tyre DPP fields fixed?Not established
Is final DPP granularity fixed?Not established
Are final DPP access rights fixed?Not established
Is GTIN a mandatory future tyre DPP identifier?Not established
Must the future tyre DPP use the existing tyre-label QR code?Not established

For the broad DPP category landscape, use /knowledge/digital-product-passport/. This dossier answers the narrower question: what is actually known for tyres, what already exists under tyre law and what should manufacturers prepare without guessing the future passport?

Current regulatory status

The public status for tyres is:

In official development

ESPR establishes the horizontal DPP framework and the mechanism for product-specific delegated acts.4 The first ESPR Working Plan prioritises tyres for further product-specific evaluation and rule development.5

The Commission's current DPP implementation timeline says:

Q3-Q4 2027: sector-specific DPP requirements for textiles, aluminium and tyres — adoption of ESPR delegated acts.1

The same Commission material labels the timeline indicative. Its economic-operator guidance says businesses will receive a transition period of at least 18 months following adoption of ESPR delegated acts.6

The current FAQ is equally important: inclusion of a product group in the Working Plan does not itself mean a DPP is already mandatory. The product-specific process still determines the appropriate ecodesign requirements, whether the DPP is the right information tool and the final legally binding compliance date.7

So the correct present-day sentence is not:

"Tyres need DPPs from 2027."

It is:

The Commission currently plans the tyre ESPR delegated act for Q3-Q4 2027. Final tyre DPP requirements and the legally binding application date are not yet established.

Which tyres are covered by existing tyre information law?

Regulation (EU) 2020/740 applies to the tyre classes within its legal scope and sets labelling and information duties for covered tyres.2

The Commission summarises the regime around:

  • C1 tyres for passenger cars
  • C2 tyres for light commercial vehicles
  • C3 tyres for heavy-duty vehicles.3

The Regulation contains exclusions and special cases. Product classification therefore remains important.

This existing-law scope should not be casually copied into a future ESPR DPP scope. The future delegated act must be read on its own terms when adopted.

For readiness, tyre businesses should already be able to connect:

  • tyre type
  • tyre class
  • product identifier
  • size designation
  • load-capacity index
  • speed-category symbol
  • supplier or manufacturer
  • label performance values
  • production-start and production-end information
  • product-database registration
  • test and technical evidence supporting declared performance.

That is existing structured information. It is not a prediction that every one of those fields will become DPP content.

What law or official process applies?

ESPR

Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 creates the horizontal ecodesign and DPP architecture.4

For future ESPR product groups, the product-specific delegated act is where category-specific requirements are fixed. That includes which information belongs in the DPP, how the carrier works and the relevant product level.

This matters for tyres because a large amount of data already exists under a different legal regime. A future ESPR act may reuse, reference, avoid duplicating or supplement that information. Until the act is adopted, the exact relationship is not settled.

The ESPR Working Plan

Tyres are prioritised in the 2025-2030 Working Plan.5

Official JRC priority work has assessed tyres as a potential ecodesign product group and considered environmental and circularity issues including durability, tyre abrasion and microplastic release, recycled content, retreading, rolling resistance and sourcing of materials.8

Those territories are evidence of policy development.

They are not a final tyre DPP field list.

Existing tyre labelling law

Regulation (EU) 2020/740 is already binding law for covered tyres.2

Its product-information architecture is particularly useful because it shows that tyre manufacturers and suppliers already operate with structured identity, performance, label and database information.

That is an adjacent-law readiness asset.

The tyre-labelling regime is also evolving

On 24 June 2026, the Commission proposed changes to the energy and tyre labelling frameworks to simplify obligations and make greater use of digital options.9

That is a proposal, not adopted final law.

It is another reason not to freeze a future DPP design around today's exact EPREL or label workflow. The adjacent regime itself is changing.

Key dates and what they mean

Date or periodMilestone typeMeaning
1 May 2021Existing tyre-law database obligationSuppliers of covered newly produced tyre types must enter Annex VII information in the product database before market placement under Regulation (EU) 2020/740.2
2025-2030ESPR Working PlanTyres are a priority product group for product-specific evaluation and requirements.5
20 July 2026DPP Registry operationalEU DPP Registry infrastructure became operational. This does not make tyre DPPs mandatory.10
24 June 2026Tyre/energy label legislative proposalCommission proposed simplification and greater digital use in the existing label regime.9
Q3-Q4 2027Planned tyre ESPR delegated actCurrent Commission indicative adoption window.1
After adoptionTransitionCommission states ESPR delegated acts will provide at least an 18-month transition period.6

A planned act-adoption window is not a market compliance date.

Do not calculate a public "tyre DPP deadline" from the Q3-Q4 2027 plan. The adopted act will establish the legally relevant transition and application rules.

What tyre data is already regulated?

Existing tyre law is unusually data-rich compared with many other ESPR priority categories.

Product identity

Regulation (EU) 2020/740 uses a tyre type identifier.2

This identifier appears in the tyre label architecture, product information sheet and product database.

That makes it a valuable existing identity object.

It should not be described as the future DPP UPI unless the future legal measure establishes that relationship.

Tyre label information

The tyre label under Regulation (EU) 2020/740 includes, depending on the applicable tyre and conditions:

  • supplier trade name or trademark
  • tyre type identifier
  • tyre size designation
  • load-capacity index
  • speed-category symbol
  • tyre class
  • fuel-efficiency / rolling-resistance performance class
  • wet-grip performance class
  • external rolling-noise information
  • snow-grip indication where applicable
  • ice-grip indication where applicable
  • a QR code in the existing label design.2

That QR code belongs to the tyre labelling regime.

It is not evidence that the future ESPR tyre DPP must use the same carrier or that "all DPPs use QR".

Product information sheet

Annex III of Regulation (EU) 2020/740 requires the tyre product information sheet to include information such as:

  • supplier/manufacturer identity
  • tyre type identifier
  • tyre size, load-capacity index and speed category
  • fuel-efficiency class
  • wet-grip class
  • external rolling-noise class and value
  • severe-snow and ice-grip indications where applicable
  • production-start date
  • production-end date once known.2

Product database / EPREL interaction

Article 5 requires suppliers to enter Annex VII information in the product database for covered tyre types before they are placed on the market.2

The Commission's current supplier guidance confirms that tyre suppliers register tyre types in EPREL and that EPREL can generate the tyre label and product information sheet from registered model data.311

This is meaningful structured product-data infrastructure.

The correct status is:

Required under other law

not:

"Already the tyre DPP."

Is existing tyre-label data the future DPP?

Not established.

The future ESPR delegated act could:

  • reuse existing information
  • link to existing information
  • avoid duplicating information already held in EPREL
  • add new information
  • define a different technical relationship.

Current primary evidence does not establish the final design.

The safest data architecture is therefore to treat existing tyre law as a source system or authoritative adjacent dataset, not as a frozen future DPP schema.

A future passport should be able to reference or map those data without forcing every DPP concept to equal an EPREL field.

What might be reused?

The following are strong readiness candidates because they already exist in regulated structured form:

Existing informationWhy it is useful for readinessFuture DPP status
Tyre type identifierStable existing regulated identityNot established as final DPP UPI
Supplier / manufacturer identityExisting legal actor dataPotentially reusable; final DPP field not established
Tyre classExisting classificationPotentially reusable
Size / load / speed designationExisting structured product definitionPotentially reusable
Rolling resistance / fuel efficiencyExisting regulated performancePotentially reusable; not automatically DPP content
Wet gripExisting regulated performancePotentially reusable
External rolling noiseExisting regulated performancePotentially reusable
Snow / ice gripExisting conditional performance informationPotentially reusable
Production start/endExisting product-information-sheet dataPotentially reusable
EPREL registration and recordsExisting database architectureReadiness asset; not itself the future DPP
Test / technical evidenceSupports declared performanceUseful evidence layer regardless of final DPP field list

The word potentially matters.

A sensible implementation can reuse what already exists without claiming the future law has already selected it.

What is in official development?

The tyre policy work extends beyond today's label.

Official ESPR priority work has considered product characteristics and sustainability areas such as:

  • durability and mileage
  • abrasion
  • microplastic release
  • recycled content
  • retreading
  • rolling resistance
  • information supporting appropriate use and maintenance
  • end-of-life or circularity information
  • sustainable material sourcing.8

These are development territories.

They should be labelled:

In official development / official study

not:

"Tyre DPPs require..."

The final ESPR act must determine whether any of these become mandatory product requirements, mandatory information requirements, DPP data or are handled through another legal mechanism.

Identifiers

ESPR establishes a horizontal requirement for a persistent unique product identifier connected to the data carrier where a product-specific DPP applies.4

Tyres already use a tyre type identifier under Regulation (EU) 2020/740.2

Those concepts should be kept distinct until the delegated act maps them.

Current position:

Identifier questionStatus
Existing tyre type identifierRequired under other law
ESPR persistent UPI architectureAdopted horizontal framework
Existing tyre type identifier becomes future DPP UPINot established
GTIN mandatory for tyre DPPNot established
GS1 Digital Link mandatoryNot established
EPREL registration number is the future DPP UPINot established

The practical action is to maintain an identifier crosswalk rather than choose one identifier and make every other system depend on it.

See /knowledge/fields/identifiers.

Data carrier

The current tyre label includes a QR code.2

That is an existing tyre-label requirement.

A future tyre DPP will operate within the ESPR data-carrier framework, but the final tyre-specific carrier details are not yet established.4

Do not infer:

existing label QR = future DPP carrier

unless the delegated act says so.

A flexible implementation should be able to resolve from more than one carrier or identifier where needed and keep the digital passport record separate from the physical print decision.

See /knowledge/passport/choosing-a-carrier-that-still-works.

Granularity: type, model, batch or item?

The final ESPR tyre DPP granularity is not established.

Existing tyre labelling and EPREL architecture is strongly organised around tyre type. That is useful context but does not decide the future DPP level.

ESPR allows product-specific rules to determine the relevant level.4

Current status:

Not established

Manufacturers should therefore retain the relationship between:

  • tyre family
  • tyre type
  • commercial model
  • size/specification
  • production batch where tracked
  • individual tyre identifiers where used.

Do not make an item-level passport assumption simply because DPP technology can support item identity.

See /knowledge/guides/granularity.

Access rights

Final tyre DPP access rights are not established.

Existing EPREL and tyre labelling already distinguish between information intended for public use and compliance/technical information available to authorities or within controlled systems.211

That is a useful precedent for data governance.

It is not the future ESPR tyre DPP access matrix.

Build access control around roles and information sensitivity, then configure the exact legal levels when the delegated act is adopted.

See /knowledge/passport/who-sees-what.

Registry, storage and persistence

The EU DPP Registry became operational on 20 July 2026.10

The Commission describes it as an indexing and registration layer that stores unique identifiers, registration data and high-level metadata rather than the full detailed DPP by default.1012

This is distinct from EPREL.

Tyre businesses may eventually interact with both:

  • EPREL / product database for obligations under tyre labelling law
  • DPP Registry where the future applicable DPP legislation requires registration.

Do not merge the two concepts in the data model.

A robust architecture should be able to store separate external-system identifiers, registration states and evidence for each.

What tyre manufacturers can prepare now

PREPARE

1. Treat existing tyre-law data as a governed source

Map every required tyre label and product-information-sheet value to its authoritative source, owner, evidence and update rule.

2. Build a clear tyre-type identity model

Keep the tyre type identifier separate from GTIN, internal SKU, EPREL identifiers and any future DPP UPI.

3. Preserve test evidence

For rolling resistance, wet grip, noise, snow/ice and other declared performance, keep method, laboratory, date, sample scope and result linked to the declaration.

4. Create an EPREL-to-product-master crosswalk

Know which internal product record corresponds to which EPREL record and which data are authoritative in each system.

5. Prepare for additional sustainability data without labelling it mandatory

If the organisation holds abrasion, mileage, retreading, recycled-content or material-sourcing information, structure it and capture provenance.

6. Separate type data from batch and item data

The future level is not settled. Preserve the relationships now.

7. Keep carrier resolution configurable

The current label QR should not become an architectural assumption that prevents a future DPP carrier design.

8. Design distinct public and restricted information layers

Existing tyre law already demonstrates the operational value of separating consumer-facing information from compliance evidence.

WATCH

Monitor:

  • the tyre ESPR delegated act and impact assessment
  • final product scope
  • final DPP data points
  • treatment of abrasion and microplastic-release information
  • durability/mileage and retreading requirements
  • recycled-content requirements
  • interaction with the evolving tyre-label regime
  • identifier mapping
  • data carrier
  • granularity
  • access rights
  • DPP Registry metadata
  • transition and application dates.

DO NOT BUILD AROUND YET

Do not assume:

  • tyres already need an ESPR DPP
  • Q3-Q4 2027 is the compliance deadline
  • the current tyre label is the DPP
  • the current EPREL record is the DPP
  • all existing tyre-label data will automatically become DPP fields
  • the tyre type identifier is automatically the future DPP UPI
  • GTIN is mandatory
  • GS1 Digital Link is mandatory
  • the existing tyre-label QR must be the DPP carrier
  • every tyre will need an item-level passport
  • abrasion, recycled content, mileage or retreading data are already final DPP fields
  • all DPP information will be public.

Open questions

The main unresolved product-specific questions are:

  1. exact ESPR tyre product scope
  2. whether and how a DPP is required for the final scope
  3. final DPP information fields
  4. relationship to tyre-label and EPREL data
  5. additional sustainability and circularity information
  6. final UPI and identifier mapping
  7. final carrier type and placement
  8. final passport granularity
  9. final access levels
  10. DPP Registry metadata and registration workflow
  11. persistence and service-provider requirements
  12. legally binding transition and application dates.

These are precisely the questions the product-specific rulemaking process is intended to settle.

Direct tyre questions

Do tyres currently require a Digital Product Passport?

No current product-specific ESPR DPP obligation for tyres is established. Tyres are in official development.

Why are tyres an ESPR priority?

Official product-priority work identifies significant resource, durability, performance and circularity questions that can be addressed through product policy.58 The final selection of ecodesign and DPP requirements remains part of the product-specific process.

What is the current timeline?

The Commission currently plans the tyre ESPR delegated act for Q3-Q4 2027.1 This is indicative and is not the compliance deadline.

What data is already regulated?

Tyre identity, label performance, product information and product-database registration are already regulated under Regulation (EU) 2020/740 for covered tyres.2

Is existing tyre-label data the future DPP?

Not established. It is an important adjacent data source and readiness asset.

What identifiers already exist?

The tyre labelling regime uses a tyre type identifier. EPREL also has registration/system identifiers. These must not be automatically equated to the future DPP UPI.

What information might be reused?

Identity, supplier information, tyre specifications, label performance data, production timing and supporting test evidence are all plausible reusable assets because they already exist in structured form. Final DPP reuse is not yet established.

What final DPP fields are established?

No final tyre-specific DPP field list is established.

Is granularity settled?

No.

Are access rights settled?

No.

What can tyre manufacturers prepare now?

Govern existing tyre-law data, identity mapping, EPREL records, test evidence and candidate sustainability data in a flexible architecture.

What should they wait for?

The final field list, identifier mapping, carrier, access model, granularity and legally binding application date.

How we know

This dossier keeps four evidence states separate:

  1. Adopted horizontal ESPR architecture
  2. Required under existing tyre law
  3. Official ESPR development and study evidence
  4. Not established

That separation prevents the most common error in this category: treating a mature adjacent product-data regime as if it were already the future DPP.

In this section

The approved Passport resources that sit under this page.

Keep exploring

The questions this page usually raises next.

Does this reach your products?

Give ActivateDigital one product and it works out which obligations apply from the product's own character, and says which it cannot decide.

Worth sharing?

Help someone else make sense of product passports.

LinkedInXEmail

Primary sources

This is a regulatory information resource, not personalised legal advice. Product scope and obligations should be checked against the law applying to the specific tyre and economic operator.