Skip to content
Open Workspace
Regulation & Market Access

What Goes in an EUDR Due Diligence Statement, and What Stays Behind It?

The statement is what you submit before placing or exporting. The Article 9 information is what you collect and keep. Two five-year clocks, two events.

Reading time
4 min
Written by
ActivateDigital
Last verified
Published
Sources
1
Share article
LinkedIn X Email
A clipboard of forms on a packing bench beside a labelled carton and a scanner.
Jump around this page

In 60 seconds

The statement is the short thing you submit and the evidence is the large thing you keep. They are governed by different articles and they contain different material. Submitting the statement is the moment you assume responsibility for the product's compliance, which makes it the assertion that the proof exists rather than the proof.

  • Article 4(2) of Regulation (EU) 2023/1115: submit the statement through the Article 33 information system before placing on the market or exporting. Annex II sets its content.
  • Article 9(1) requires a longer set of information in eight categories, kept for five years from the placing on the market or the export.
  • Statements are kept for five years from submission under Article 4(3). Two five-year clocks, started by two different events.
  • Under Article 4(3), submitting the statement means assuming responsibility for the product's compliance with Article 3.
  • Article 9(1) covers plot geolocation with the date or time range of production and the names and contact details of both suppliers and customers.

Article 4(2) of Regulation (EU) 2023/1115 requires an operator to submit a due diligence statement to the competent authorities, through the information system referred to in Article 33, before placing a relevant product on the market or exporting it. The statement contains the information set out in Annex II.

Article 9(1) requires the operator to collect a different and much longer set of information, and to keep it for five years.

Most EUDR programmes that go wrong go wrong here. A team builds the submission, files it and treats the filing as the compliance. Article 4(3) says the opposite: by making the statement available to competent authorities, the operator assumes responsibility for the product's compliance with Article 3.

The two lists, side by side

What it isWhere it livesHow long
The statementThe declaration submitted before placing or exporting, containing the Annex II informationSubmitted through the Article 33 information systemA record of statements kept five years from submission, Article 4(3)
The evidenceThe Article 9(1) information the operator collects to reach the statementWherever the operator keeps itFive years from the placing on the market or the export, Article 9(1)

Two five-year clocks, started by two different events. A programme that runs one retention rule for both will keep the wrong thing for the wrong period on at least one of them.

What Article 9(1) requires you to collect

Eight categories, lettered in the Regulation:

  • (a) the product description, including trade name, type and species name;
  • (b) the quantity;
  • (c) the country of production, and parts of it;
  • (d) the geolocation of all plots of land where the relevant commodities were

produced, and the date or time range of production;

  • (e) the name and contact details of suppliers;
  • (f) the name and contact details of customers;
  • (g) the information demonstrating that the commodities and products are

deforestation-free;

  • (h) the information demonstrating that production was in accordance with the

relevant legislation of the country of production.

Point (d) is the one that drives the cost, and the Regulation is specific about the form it has to take. That is a question of its own, on what precision EUDR asks a plot geolocation for.

On points (e) and (f): a due diligence programme that maps upstream and stops has collected half of what the article asks for.

What this page does not list

It does not list Annex II item by item.

Annex II is the Regulation's own specification of what the statement itself must contain. It's short, and a summary here would add a second, less reliable copy of a list that already exists in one authoritative place. Read Annex II in the consolidated Regulation.

What Annex II cannot tell you on its own: the statement's contents and the Article 9 information are not the same set, and that having the second is what entitles you to submit the first.

The information system

Article 33 establishes an information system containing the due diligence statements submitted under Article 4(2).

The Regulation does not give it a trading name. It refers to it throughout as the information system referred to in Article 33. Bear that in mind when a supplier proposal names a system and asserts it is the one the law means.

What submitting one commits you to

Article 4(3):

  1. You assume responsibility for the product's compliance with Article 3.
  2. You keep a record of the statements for five years from the date the statement is submitted.

Article 3 is the substantive prohibition. So the statement is not a filing obligation that sits alongside a compliance obligation. It is the moment the compliance obligation attaches to you by name.

What this page will not do

It will not tell you whether your product is in scope. Scope runs through Annex I and the Combined Nomenclature, and it is owned by the EUDR page.

It will not give you a template. A template that does not come from the Regulation's own Annex II and the current information system is a guess with formatting.

It will not treat the statement as evidence. Nothing in Article 4 describes it that way, and the parent page says the same thing for the same reason.

What would change this answer

Recheck if:

  • Annex II is amended;
  • Article 4 or Article 9 is amended, particularly the retention periods;
  • Article 33 is amended, or the Commission publishes binding technical specifications for

the information system that change what a submission contains.

Last verified 12 September 2026.

Keep exploring

The questions this page usually raises next.

Sources and legal basis

Does this reach your products?

Give ActivateDigital one product and it works out which obligations apply from the product's own character, and says which it cannot decide.